The Rumor Mill News Reading Room
HISTORY REPEATS: Esau, Edomites, Phoenicians, Canaanites & Jews :New World Order as hatchet men
Posted By: watcher51445 <Send E-Mail>
Date: Thursday, 15 January 2009, 8:52 a.m.
|Esau, Edomites, Phoenicians, Canaanites & Jews|
snip: Ham was persuaded by his consort Naamah, to practice ritual murder and cannibalism. The word “cannibalism” comes from Canaan and the demon god Baal. Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan p. 12 (1987). By eating fair-skinned persons, he was told, his descendants would regain their superior qualities. Eustace Mullins, The Curse of Canaan p. 11 (1987). The lands of Israel and southern Syria once formed the empire of the Canaanites and the early Phoenicians: “Archeologists have found evidence of a definite connection between the Canaanites and the Phoenicians, linking them to the Egyptians. The Canaanite pantheon of gods is similar to that of the Eyptians, the Hindus and the Builders.” Norman Paulsen, Christ Consciousness p. 354 (1984). Cain, “who was of that wicked one” (I John 3:12) was the first to use his inherent ability to do evil by killing His half-brother Abel, who was a servant of God. Likewise, the synagogue of Satan uses all manner of evil to harm the people of God, in their quest to take from Israel their God-given birthright. Why do they want this birthright? Because it one of their Adamic forefathers sold his birthright to Jacob/Israel for a bowl of soup. Malachi 1:2-3 and Romans 9:13 tell us, “Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.” We read how Esau grieved his parents by marrying into the Canaanite line: “Esau was forty years old when he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite: which were a grief of mind to Isaac and to Rebekah . . . and Aholibamah the daughter of Anah the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite; and Bashemath Ishmael’s daughter, sister of Nebajoth” (Genesis 26:34-35; 36:2-3). Esau was quite the mongrelizer. Though he was of the Adamic race and the blood of Abraham, “A little leaven leavens the whole lump” and he commited genocide by marrying into the bloodline of Canaan, “leavening” his proginy, the Edomites. Gensis 36:8, “Esau is Edom.” The Jewish Encyclopedia tells us that “Edom is in Modern Jewry”. This witness from the 1905 edition records the connection between modern day Jews and the race of Edom: “Some anthropologists are inclined to associate the racial origins of the Jews, not with the Semites, whose language they adopted, but with the Armenians and Hittites of Mesopotamia, whose broad skulls and curved noses they appear to have inherited (Vol. X, p. 284). Thus Esau/Edom was now absorbed into the Canaanite people by means of his Hittite and Hivite wives. According to Strong’s Concordance the word Canaan means “trader or merchant” and the Phoenicians, as Canaanites, are derived from Ham’s incestuous relationship with Naamah the sister of Tubalcain, the wife Noah took with him in the Ark (Genesis 9:18-27; 10:6, 15-19). Owing to the intermarriage of their forefathers with Canaanites, there were probably few Israelites without Phoenician, that is, Serpent’s seed blood in their veins. Judges 3:5-6, “The children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites, Hittites, and Amorites, and Perizzites, and Hivites, and Jebusites: and they took their daughters to be their wives, and gave their daughters to their sons, and served their gods”. The Jews claimed to be the children of Abraham however that they were not true children of Abraham is certain when they say that they were never in bondage (John 8:32-33). “Phoenician” is a Greek word connoting “palm tree” and as such does not appear in the Old Testament where the locals call themselves “Canaanites.” The name Kennan is preserved on a coin of Laodicea, of the time of Antiochus Epiphanes, whereon Laodicea is styled, “a mother city in Canaan.” The Phoenicians or Canaanites were the most powerful of all tribes in Palestine at the time of its invasion by Joshua. In speaking of their own territory as it was before the conquest the Israelites called it, “the land of Canaan.” After the conquest the tendency developed to call only the coastal strip and the Jordan Valley the land of Canaan. As late as the second century AD the descendants of the Carthaginians in North Africa called themselves Canaanites. The term “Canaanite” came to denote the members of a Jewish sect who was a zelot or fanatic (Matthew 10:4). The Phoenicians were the great maritime and commercial people of the ancient world, and pre-eminent in colonization. The Romans transcribed the Greek “phoenix” to “poenus”, thus calling the emigres to Carthage “punic.” Augustine of Hippo stated that the peasants in his part of Africa, if asked their race, would answer, in Punic or Phoenician, “Canaanites.” In Hebrew “canaan” means, “merchant” or “trafficer,” “to bend the knee,” “bring down low,” “humiliate” or “vanquish.” Genesis 10:18, “the families of the Canaanites (would be scattered, vanquished, or) spread abroad”. Canaanite, Khazar and Edomite are all names that accurately refer to the majority of people who call themselves “Jews.” The name Jew originally meant a resident of Judea regardless of religion or race, and has long since lost any association with a true Judahite. Jesus made this clear in Revelation 2:9, “I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not but are a synagogue of Satan.” And 3:9, “I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie; indeed I will make them to come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you”. [why we are in Iraq today] The Phoenicians spoke a form of Aramaic. It was a Semitic language in common with the Israelites, Tyre, Sidon, Byblos and neighboring towns, and in other areas of the Mediterranean colonized by Phoenician people known as Aramaeans. It was most closely related to Hebrew, Syriac and Moabite which were written in a script derived from the Phoenician alphabet. The earliest Phoenician inscription deciphered dates probably from the 11th century BC; the latest inscription from Phoenicia proper is from the 1st century BC, when the language was already being superseded by Aramaic proper. The language spread to its colonies. In the North African city of Carthage, a later stage of the language, known as Pun (Latin – punica, poenica, Phoenician) which was influenced by the Berber, became the language of the Carthaginian empire. Phoencian survived in use as a vernacular in some of the smaller cities of North Africa at least until the time of St. Augustine, bishop of Hippo (5th century AD) and continued to be used by North African peasants until the 6th century AD. Phoenician words are found in Greek and Latin classical literature as well as in Egyptian, Accadian, and Hebrew writings. The language written in the 22-character alphabet adopted by the Hebrews does not indicate vowels. In the Babylonian inscriptions the Accadians are called “the black heads” and “the black faces,” in contrast to “the white race” of Semitic descent. They lived in southern Mesopotamia (present-day Iraq), and worshipped the Trinity as El (or ilu, the father god), Ea (god of the earth and creator of man) and Enlil (the god of the air). The early ilu can be seen as the Canaanite and Assyrian “El” for God, and also in Hebrew such as elohim and “El Shadai.” The Sumerians who lived in the same region and date to the same period invented cuneiform writing, but were distinct from the Semitic Accadians, and spoke an unrelated language. Ea was known the Sumerians as “Enki.” In Sumerian, En- denotes kingship the way we use “lord” in English. Enki means literally “lord of the earth.” The Sumerian word lil can mean “air,” “breath,” or “spirit.” The similarity between this Sumerian and Accadian Trinity and the Holy Spirit of the Roman Catholic form of the same Trinity should be obvious. more on this very interesting article http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/edomites.htm WHO ARE THE EDOMITES? THE EDOMITES
OF THE END-TIME
OF CHRIST AT
OF BOZRAH QUOTE: Consider the Jewish people, the children of the patriarch Judah. They were uprooted by the Babylonians in 587 B.C.. Then after their return from Babylon under Zerubbabel, Ezra and Nehemiah they suffered the destruction of the temple and the city of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.. Then they were scattered again by the Romans in the following years. Their land was named ‘Palestine’ after the Philistines, Israel’s worst enemy. Today we are very well aware of just how far the Jews have gone since their scattering from their ancient homeland in southern Israel two millennia ago. Up until the 20th century nearly all of the Jews remained scattered far from Jerusalem and Judah. The Diaspora were seeded among all nations. If we had visited the land of ancient Israel in earlier centuries we would fail to turn up the sovereign nation of Israel or even any significant number of Jewish inhabitants. Today, of course, it is a different story. But still only 4 million of the 20 odd million Jews are back in the land. snip: None of Saul’s men in the army of Israel would obey this heinous order. It was a call to slaughter the holy priests of Israel. But King Saul’s murderous anger did draw a certain Edomite whose name was Doeg. He stepped forward to respond to the order. And here we see an example of Edomite wrath at its worst. Doeg killed all the priests of Nob. He showed none of them any mercy whatsoever. Then he proceeded to kill all the women and children in the city as well. But he was still not finished. He then proceeded to kill every animal. By the time the Edomite had finished slaughtering there was not a living human soul or animal left in the city. -1Sam.22:16-19. Haman was an Edomite in the days of Queen Esther. His genocidal plot to destroy the Jews is well known. Such was, and is, the murderous genocidal wrath and anger of the sons of Esau when they are stirred up. Let us move forward to the time of Christ’s first advent. We know Esau’s sons were around at that time and impacting holy history. The Herods were Edomites and they ruled over the Jewish nation in Judea. They ruled with an iron hand under the Roman superpower. The Romans found the Edomites very useful in performing their wishes and getting things done. Brutal Roman ways were never a problem for the Edomites. They were always eager to oblige their Roman masters and spill Jewish blood whenever the occasion presented itself. Herod butchered his own children when he feared they might be a threat to his rule. And Herod’s barbarous massacre of the children of Bethlehem is a well known part of the Christmas story. After their visit with King Herod the wise men must have seen something that disturbed them. After finding the Christ child they were not inclined to return to Herod as he had requested. Instead they returned to their own country by another way. So is Isaac’s firstborn son Esau still in our midst today? Have we seen any evidence of his anger and murderous wrath? Well this past century has seen genocides too numerous to recount. The 20th century saw more Christians and Jews martyred than all the previous centuries combined. Current martyrdoms are rising and number approximately 150,000 per year. Genocide of good people and innocent unborn babes and infants is on the increase. What other evidence do we have of genocidal wrath in modern history? 1901 saw the first concentration camps for civilians. The British government, (not the Germans), were the perpetrators. Tens of thousands of innocent Boer women and children were incarcerated behind barbed wire in compounds. This martial law policy was instituted in the Transvaal in South Africa by Lord Kitchener. He realized that the Boer farmers were using guerrilla tactics. The Boers were striking at the British by day and being supported by their womenfolk from their farmhouses by night. Lord Kitchener elected to deal with this by sanctioning brutal tactics and the establishment of martial law in the Transvaal. Under this horrific policy women and children were rounded up at gunpoint and penned up in concentration camps throughout the Transvaal. This is a little known piece of history. I was not taught this in British History class in grammar school. Many women and children sickened and died in these awful places of incarceration. Was the policy ‘successful’ in bringing the war to a close? Yes it was. Martial law is the only way to win a guerrilla war. Dear saints, here is a truth that governmental leaders will never reveal to its citizens. The enforcement of a police state or martial law is necessary to win a guerrilla war. It worked in the British occupation of the Transvaal. And it worked in the German occupation of France and Europe during World War 2. This pacification of the country was undertaken by a heartless police state, martial law, and a program of terror. This was instituted by the British Army and by the German Gestapo. History shows that as a program of social dismemberment these measures do break the will of the captive nation to fight. The Americans were and are the greatest military power this world has ever seen. Yet they were defeated in Vietnam. This was because they had become bogged down in a guerrilla war with no command of what went on in the villages and no good intelligence on the ground. At that time the Americans were unwilling to institute a police state in Vietnam. They were unprepared initiate and to carry out the orders necessary for such an inhuman and monstrous system of conquest. After all, they were fighting to win freedom for the people of South Vietnam. Freedom and police states don’t go together too well. And this war had a lot of reporters and photo journalists keeping an eye on things and snapping photos. Americans by nature are a freedom loving people. It would have been very hard to get regular U.S. soldiers to get into the nitty gritty of setting up an American Gestapo style administration to rule over the Vietnamese villagers. There were exceptions to this. Special forces did exist and did enact martial law in some areas. These were “black” operations and the American people heard little about these secret “phoenix” operations. In the areas in which they operated these brutal programs did have some ‘success’. But they torture and other inhumane methods to gain information from the Viet Cong. These unsavory phoenix operations had to be secret and small. They could not be hidden from the American reporters and cameramen forever. So despite enormous air power and firepower the Americans did not have the political will or desire to rule with an iron Edomite fist. They were unwilling or unable to domineer the Vietnamese civilian populace as brutal occupiers. The eventual outcome was inevitable. The Americans were worn down by a determined enemy who were more brutal with civilians than they were. Eventually the U.S. military forces were forced to withdraw from Vietnam. Not so fortunate were civilians under totalitarian regimes in the Soviet Union and China. The police state genocides by the communist leaders Stalin and Mao numbered in the range of 40 to 60 million each. Cambodian communist leader Pol Pot set a process in motion that would see over three million or one third of his citizens perish in the “killing fields”. Oftentimes the victims were killed because they were just in the wrong social class. The holocaust against European Jewry under Hitler’s Nazi regime took 6 million to the death chambers. Lest we become comfortable in our own sense of self-righteousness what can we say about the allied bombing of German cities in World War 2? The American 8th Air Force bombed by day and British Bomber Command sent the Lancasters over for “area bombardment” of German cities by night. With the area night bombing raids no attempt was made to concentrate on hitting military targets only. It has been well documented that the bombing of cities did not stop the German war machine. Only the invasion of Europe by the allies did that. The war was ending as the firestorms swept through German cities. Was there any sound military reason to bomb the cities of Hamburg and Dresden until the whole city, including the asphalt roads, were all burning as a huge single mass of flames? 80,000 civilians, including women and children, perished in the firestorms of Hamburg. A similar number in died in the Dresden bombing and the subsequent firestorm. Was anything to be gained for the war effort against the German military machine by conducting this genocide? This horrific bombing campaign killed as many civilians as the A-bombing attacks on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These round the clock firestorm bombing campaigns against German cities were genocidal. Were they a military necessity? The diabolical scheme used by the allies used alternating bombing raids of incendiaries and high explosive charges. The whole city would be set ablaze as one huge fire. Even the asphalt roads would be be caught up in the inferno and the flames roared in towards the center of the city. Was this anything other than a program of sheer terrorism? Do we see shades of Edom in the genocides we and our enemies have perpetrated since the advent of air power? If this hasn’t been enough what are we to surmise about missile technology for delivery of nuclear warheads? As the nations begin to rage as we approach the end of the age are modern wars becoming less a contest of armies on battlefields and more and more turning into contests over destruction of cities? Is the warfare now between our Edomites and the Edomites of our enemies? And what can we say about modern nuclear warfare waged by whole countries against whole countries? Such warfare threatens to destroy all life on the planet. While we can do little to prevent it is Esau and his MAD policy now in the driver’s seat of history? Is Esau on the rise, just as the patriarch Isaac has prophesied? (Gen.27:39-40)THE RETURN OF THE EDOMITES.
AND THEIR PROMINENT ROLE AGAINST JACOBAS WORLD HISTORY ENTERS THE END TIME DRAMA. There is no doubt that the scriptures indicate that Esau will come to prominence again in the end-time. – Gen.27:39-40 Will wild Edomites be used in the coming New World Order as hatchet men, just as they were under the Romans? Will Esau re-emerge to be used again just as he has been used by world powers in past history?