Quote from “Foreign Conspiracy against the Liberties of the United States” by Samuel Morse 1835. The food of Popery is ignorance. Ignorance is the mother of papal devotion. Ignorance is the legitimate prey of Popery. Ignorance: The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uniformed

Rulers of Evil
Author F Tupper Saussy  Click here
SUBLIMINAL ROME
Chapter 1
” The Roman Catholic Church is a State.”
Bishop Mandell Creighton, Letters
“All Roads Lead To Rome”

Listen to internet radio with Mystery Babylon Radio on Blog Talk Radio  

Subliminal Rome with the pictures!

Pictures are worth a thousand words!
Five thousand words in the right place.  Click here

    When a Pulitzer Prize winning reporter announced in his 1992 Time Magazine cover story that a “conspiracy” binding President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II into a “secret, holy alliance” had brought about the demise of communism, at least one reader saw through the hype.
    Professor Carol A. Brown of the University of Massachusetts fired off a letter to Time’s editors saying,
    Last week I taught my students about the separation of church and state.  This week I learned that the Pope is running U.S. foreign policy.  No wonder our young people are cynical about American ideals.

    What Brown had learned from Carl Bernstein I had discovered for myself over several years of private investigation: the papacy really does run United States foreign policy, and always has.  Yes, Bernstein noted that the leading American players behind the Reagan/Vatican conspiracy, to a man, were “devout Roman Catholics“-namely,cid:image001.jpg@01CF063F.A72FFCC0

William Casey
Director, CIA
Alexander Haig
Secretary of State
  
Richard Allen
National Security Advisor
Vernon Walters
Ambassador-at-Large
  
Judge William Clark
National Security Advisor
William Wilson
Ambassador to the Vatican State

       But the reporter neglected to mention that the entire Senate Foreign Relations committee was governed by Roman Catholics, as well.  Specifically, Senators

Joseph Biden
Subcommittee on European Affairs
John Kerry
Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Communications
  
Paul Sarbanes
International Ecomic Policy, Trade, Oceans, and Environment
and….
  
Daniel P. Moynihan
Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs
Christopher Dodd
Western Hemi-sphere and Peace Corps Affairs

    Bernstein Would have been wandering off-point to list the Roman Catholic leaders of American domestic policy, such as Senate majority leader George Mitchell and Speaker of the House Tom Foley.
    In fact, when the holy alliance story hit the stands, there was virtually no arena of federal legislative activity, according to The 1992 World Almanac of US Politics, that was not directly controlled by a Roman Catholic senator or representative.  The committees and subcommittees of the United States Senate and House of Representatives governing commerce, communications and telecommunications, energy, medicine, health, education and welfare, human services, consumer protection, finance and financial institutions, transportation, labor and unemployment, hazardous materials, taxation, bank regulation, currency and monetary policy, oversight of the Federal Reserve System, commodity prices, rents services, small business administration, urban affairs, European affairs, Near Eastern & South Asian affairs, terrorism/narcotics/international communications, international economic/trade/oceans/environmental policy, insurance, housing, community development, federal loan guarantees, economic stabilization measures (including wage and price controls), gold and precious metals transactions, agriculture, animal and forestry industries, rural issues, nutrition, price supports, Food for Peace, agricultural exports, soil conservation, irrigation, stream channelization, flood control, minority enterprise, environment and pollution, appropriations, defense, foreign operations, vaccines, drug labeling and packaging, drug and alcohol abuse, inspection and certification of fish and processed food,use of vitamins and saccharin, national health insurance proposals, human services, legal services, family relations, the arts and humanities, the handicapped, and aging-in other words, virtually every aspect of secular life in America came under the chairmanship of one of the Roman Catholic laypersons:   Who rules? click here

Frank AnnunzioEdward KennedyDaniel Moynihan
Joseph BidenJohn KerryJohn Murtha
Silvio ConteJohn LaFalceMary Rose Oakar
Kika De la GarzaPatrick LeahyDavid Obey
John DingellCharles LukenClaiborne Pell
Christopher DoddEdward MadiganCharles Rangel
Vic FazioEdward MarkeyDan Rostenkowski
James FlorioJoseph McDadeor Edward Roybal
Henry GonzalezBarbara Mikulski 
Thomas HarkinGeorge Miller 

    Vatican Council II’s Constitution on the Church (1964) instructs politicians to use their secular offices to advance the cause of Roman Catholicism.  Catholic laypersons, “whoever they are, are called upon to expend all their energy for the growth of the Church and its continuous sanctification,’ and ‘to make the Church present and operative in those places and circumstances where only through them can it become the salt of the earth” (IV,33). Vatican II further instructs all Catholics “by their competence in secular disciplines and by their activity {[to} vigorously contribute their effort so that… the goods of this world may be more equitably distributed among all men, and may in their own way be conducive to universal progress in human and Christian freedom … and (to) remedy the customs and conditions of the world, if they are an inducement to sin, so that they all may be conformed to the norms of justice and may favor the practice of virtue rather than hinder it” (IV,36)
    Vatican II affirms Catholic doctrine dating back to 1302, when Pope Boniface VIII asserted that “it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.”  This was the inspiration of the papacy to create the United States of America that materialized in 1776, by a process just as secret as the Reagan-Vatican production of Eastern Europe in 1989.  What?  American government Roman Catholic from the beginning?
    Consider: the land known today as the District of Columbia bore the name “Rome” in 1663 property records; and the branch of the Potomac River that bordered “Rome” on the south was called “Tiber.”  This information was reported int the 1902 edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia’s  article on Daniel Carroll.  The article, specifically declaring itself “of interest to Catholics” in the 1902 edition, was deleted from the New Catholic Encyclopedia (1967).  Other facts were reported in 1902 and deleted from 1967.  For example, when Congress met in Washington for the first time, in November, 1800, “the only two really comfortable and imposing houses within the bounds of the city” belonged to Roman Catholics.  One was Washington’s first mayor, Robert Brent.  The other was Brent’s brother-in-law, Notley Young, a Jesuit priest.
    Daniel Carroll was a Roman Catholic congressman from Maryland who signed two of America’s fundamental documents, the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution.  Carroll was a direct descendant of the Calverts, a Catholic family to who King Charles I of England had granted Maryland as a feudal barony.  Carroll had received his education at St. Omer’s Jesuit College in Flanders, where young English-speaking Catholics were trained in variety of guerrilla techniques for advancing the cause of the Roman Catholicism among hostile Protestants.
    In 1790, President George Washington, a Protestant, appointed Congressman Carroll to head a commission of three men to select land for the “federal city” called for in the Constitution.  Of all places, the commission chose “Rome,” which at the time consisted of four farms, one of which belonged to…Daniel Carroll.  It was upon Carroll’s farm that the new government chose to erect its most important building, the Capitol.
    The American Capitol abounds with clues of its Roman origins.  “Freedom,” the Roman goddess whose statue crowns the dome, was created in Rome at the studio of American sculptor Thomas Crawford.  We find a whole pantheon of Roman deities in the great fresco covering the dome’s interior rotunda: Persephone, Cers, Freedom, Vulcan, Mercury, even a deified George Washington.  These figures were the creation of Vatican artist Constantino Brumidi.
    The fact that the national Statehouse evolved as a “capitol” bespeaks Roman influence.  No Building can rightly be called a capitol unless it’s a temple of Jupiter, the great father-god of Rome who ruled heaven with his thunderbolts and nourished the earth with his fertilizing rains.  If it was a capitolium, it belonged to Jupiter and his priest.
    Jupiter’s mascot was the eagle, which the founding fathers made their mascot as well.  A Roman eagle tops the governing idol of the House of Representatives, a forty-six-inch sterling silver and -ebony wand called a “mace,”  The mace is “the symbol of authority in the House.”  When the Sergeant-at-arms displays it before an unruly member of Congress, the mace restores order.  Its position at the rostrum tells whether the House is in “committee” or in “session.”
    America’s national motto “Annuit Coeptis” came from a prayer to Jupiter.  It appears in Book IX of Virgil’s epic propaganda, the Aeneid, a poem commissioned just before the birth of Christ by Caius Maecenas, the mult-billionaire power behind Augustus Caesar.  The poem’s objective was to fashion Rome into an imperial monarchy for which its citizens would gladly sacrifice their lives.
    Fascism may be an ugly word to  many, but its stately emblem is apparently offensive to no one.  The emblem of fascism, a pair of them, commands the wall above and behind the speakers rostrum in the Chamber of the House of Representatives.  They’re called fasces, and I can think of no reason for them to be there other than to declare the fascistic nature of American republican democracy.  A fasces is a Roman device.  Actually, it originated with the ancient Etruscans, from whom the earliest Romans derived their religious jurisprudence nearly three thousand years ago.  It’s an axe-head whose handle is a bundle of rods tightly strapped together by a red sinew.  It symbolizes the ordering of priestly functions in a single infallible sovereign, an autocrat who could require life and limb of his subjects  If the fasces is entwined with laurel, like the pair on the House wall, it signifies Caesarean military power.  The Romans called this infallible sovereign Pontifex Maximus, “Supreme Bridgebuilder.” No Roman was called Pontifex Maximus until the title was given to Julius Caesar in 48 BC.  Today’s Pontifex Maximus is Pope John Paull II.

    As we shall discover in forthcoming chapter, John Paul does not hold that title alone.  He shares it with a mysterious partner, a military man, a man holding and office that has been know for more than four centuries as “Papa Nero,” the Black Pope.  I shall present evidence that th House fasces represent the Black Pope, who indeed rules the world.
    Later, I will develop what is sure to become a controversial hypothesis: that the Black Pope rules by divine appointment, and for the ultimate good of mankind.                                                  Who Rules Click here

Quote from Tupper Saussy: They’re called fasces, and I can think of no reason for them to be there other than to declare the fascistic nature of American republican democracy.

Ask yourself the Question.  Why would they be there?

Page 73&74
    During its four centuries of existence, the Jesuit educational/theatrical enterprise has produced a proud, poised, and imaginative graduate.  He or she is enlightened by the Medici Library’s humanities, facile in worldly matters, moved by theatricality, and indifferent toward Holy Scripture.  Producing Jesuitic graduates has become the aim of modern public education, despite the heavy price of ignoring Scripture (which, as Luther warned and the Columbine murders attest, has indeed turned the public schools into “widening gates of hell”).  Jesuit theatre and the Spiritual Exercises, whose original purpose was to bring human understanding into papal subservience through esoteric emotional experiences, have evolved into the full panoply of contemporary social communication.
    The great objective of obscuring Scripture has operated to discourage the formal study of the basics of which the Bible is the cornerstone-literature, science and history.

O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 1 Timothy 6:20 (King James Version)

Research by the National Association of Scholars (NAS) of U.S. News & World Report’s annual listing of “America’s Best Colleges” (including both private and public) disclosed startling figures.  In 1914, nearly all of these institutions had required courses in English composition; by 1964 the figure was 86%; in 1996, 36%.  In 1914, 82% of the best colleges and universities had traditional mathematics requirements; more than 70% of the institutions required at least one course in the natural sciences; that figure fell to 34% in 1996.  Literature courses were required at 75% of the institutions in 1914, and at 50% in 1939 and 1964.  Today, none of the “best” institutions has a literature requirement.  Most colleges today are turning out graduates who have studied little or no history.  In 1914, 90% of America’s elite colleges required history; in 1939 and 1964 more than 50% did; by 1996 only one of the 50 best schools offered a required history course. (Religious freedom does not mean that you cannot teach about the history of religion.)The day is approaching, perhaps, when the only historians will be amateurs who study history as self-help, who examine the past in order to make sense of the present and not be caught unprepared by the future.

 Quote from John Daniel  from the his book “The Grand Design Exposed” page 84:  To many, history might be dry and boring, yet if we have a burning desire to understand what is truth, then history becomes vibrant and alive.  History sheds light on our present  world and also gives understanding for the future.  It is through history that we find our roots, and has become the reason and object of why much of our history today has been throughly censored; so that our roots will be purposely obscured.

Who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present, controls the past.

George Orwell
Who Controlled the dark ages?  Who  controls the present?
Psst!!!  The first Question Answers the second Question.

Quote from “Foreign Conspiracy against the Liberties of the United States” by Samuel Morse 1835. The food of Popery is ignorance. Ignorance is the mother of papal devotion. Ignorance is the legitimate prey of Popery. Ignorance: The condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uniformed.

America’s understanding has been systematically bent to the will of the Church Militant, while the intellectual means for sensing the capture have been disconnected.  Most of the content of modern media, whether television, radio, print, film, stage, or web is state-of-the-art Jesuit ratio studiorum.
 

The below comes from the Catholic Encyclopedia
(The term “Ratio Studiorum” is commonly used to designate the educational system of the Jesuits; it is an abbreviation of the official title, “Ratio atque InstitutioStudiorum Societatis Jesu”, i.e. “Method and System of the Studies of the Society of Jesus”.)


The Jesuit college is no longer just a chartered institution; it has become our entire social environment-the movies, the mall, the school, the home, the mind.  Human experience has become a Spiritual Exercise managed by charismatic spiritual directors who know how to manipulate a democracy’s emotions.  Logic, perspective, national memory, and self-discipline are purged to the point that “unbridled emotional responses,” as economist Thomas Sowell put it, “are all we have left.”
    Despite its ascendancy over American life, few Americans understand the term “Jesuit.”  In our next chapter, we shall examine how this term is defined in our basic reference works.  These definitions will help us to better understand the kind of character produced by Ignatian psychological technique.

Jesuit Institutions     There are  28 Jesuit colleges and universities in the United States are located in 19 states across the country.  The institutions range from major research universities to comprehensive universities, from smaller colleges and universities that combine the liberal arts and professional studies to one strictly liberal arts college.
    In addition to being among 221 Catholic institutions and 1600 independent colleges and universities in the United States, American Jesuit colleges and universities are part of a network of approximately 133 Jesuit institutions of higher learning throughout the world, thus having the distinction of being at once local, regional, national and international.   source click here

Page  80thru82
Casuistry,  kazh-oo-uh-stree
specious, deceptive, or oversubtle reasoning,
esp. in questions of morality; fallacious or dishonest
application of general principles; sophistry.

My comment:
Babylonia system(Casuistry) is a system of rationalization to do legally what is forbidden morally.

Casuistry is the process of applying moral principles falsely in deciding the rights  or wrongs of case-the word “casuistry” comes from “cases.” WWWebster equates casuistry with rationalization, “to cause something to seem reasonable; to provide plausible but untrue reasons for conduct.” (In early 1999, President Clinton’s biographer, David Maraniss, could be see remarking on talk shows that the President owed his formidable skills as a criminal defendant to “his training in casuistry at Georgetown University.”) The great Jesuit casuist Antonio Escobar pardoned evildoing as long as it was committed in pursuit of a lofty goal.  “Purity of intention,” he declared in 1627, “may justify actions which are contrary to the moral code and to human laws.”  Hermann Busenbaum ratified Escobar with his own famous maxim “Cum finis estlicitus, etiam media sunt licita,” “If the end is legal, the means are legal.”  Escobar and Busenbaum boil down to the essential doctrine of terrorism: “The end justifies the means.

( My comment: Babylonia system is a system of rationalization to do legally what is forbidden morally. )

Casuistry solved the problem of usury.  Although the voice of Jesus commanded “lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward will be great” (Luke 6:35),But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil.) Jesuit lenders often charged exorbitant interest.  Father Gury explained the principle:
 If lending on hundred francs you are losing ten francs by it, you lend really one hundred and ten francs.  Then you shall receive one hundred and ten francs.
    Indeed, casuistry has set the moral tone of world economics.  In his Universae theologiae moralis (“Catholic Moral Theology” 1652-66), Antonio Escobar rendered the opinion that “The giving of short weight is not to be reckoned as a sin when the official price for certain goods is so low that the merchant would be ruined thereby.”  By this reasoning, the international network of central banks (beginning with the Knights Templars and sustained by the Society of Jesus) has been absolved of manipulating monetary values if doing so helps individual sovereign nation-states manage their subjects.  Subjects are cyclically required to part with true value-that is, hard-earned gold and silver coinage-in exchange for intangible credit denominated in paper notes whose official promises to repay in precious coinage..are cyclically broken.  As the most powerful office in Roman Catholicism, the black papacy might have promoted stable national economies by means of the divinely fair monetary system commanded in the Bible at Levticus 19- 35,36
35 ¶Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure. 36 Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin, shall ye have: I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt. 37 Therefore shall ye observe all my statutes, and all my judgments, and do them: I am the LORD. Leviticus 19:35-37
     Instead, it has promoted Esobar’s casuistry, which directs merchants to survive official value manipulations by cheating one an other.  There are significant sociological consequences.  When giving short weight becomes policy, a moral paradigm is set.  That paradigm governs more than just commercial transactions.  It affects human relationships, as well.  Partners in friendships, marriages, and families begin giving short weight-giving less than represented.  This results in on-sided, frustrating, dysfunctional emotional transactions, and ultimately an aberrant(departing from the right, normal, or usual course) society,  The ultimate beneficiary of aberrant societies, of course, is Ponitifex Maximus, whose profession is their regulation.
    If we depend solely on dictionary definitions, we learn that Jesuits are churchmen and teachers of a doubtful moral rectitude who are likely to cheat, trick, plot, scheme, deceive, and confuse us while avoiding to commit themselves verbally.  When we study their published moralist, we sense a rather vibrant presence of The Trickster.  But in the Society’s defense, it must be said these are legitimate character traits for a militia empowered by a declaration of war, and we must remember that Paull III’s bull ordaining the Society of Jesus, Regimini militantis ecclesiae, is just such a declaration.  Human life in a declared war becomes subject to the first great rule of war, belli legum dormit, “in war the law sleeps.”  When the law sleeps the unarmed priest’s only weapons are the intrigue, deceit, equivocation, casuistry, and mental reservation with which the Jesuits have made themselves so notorious and so often despised.
    In forthcoming chapters, we shall be examining how the Society of Jesus made war against Great Britain and the British colonies during the second half of the eighteenth century, and then against the sovereign American States a century later.  In each instance, the warfare was of the highest sophistication.  It was so subtly conceived and so masterfully executed, that neither of the major combatants could discern the presence of Jesuits in the equation.  The amazing technology of Jesuit warfare-that is the subject of our next chapter.

Chapter 11 page 85&86   
    Before the American Revolution, Roman Catholics were barred from voting or holding public office throughout the British colonies.  They were a persecuted minority everywhere but in the proprietary domain of William Penn (Pennsylvania and Delaware).  Some of their most energetic persecutors, in fact, were the very Huguenots whom the Catholics had chased out of France in the wake of Louis XIV’s revocation of the Edict of Nantes.  
    The basis of Roman Catholic persecution was political.  Catholics owed allegiance to Pontifex Maximus, the Bishop of Rome.  The Bishop of Rome was a foreign ruler who, as a matter of public policy, regarded the British king and his Protestant Church as heretics to be destroyed.  From the American colonists’ standpoint, to allow Catholics to vote or hold office was tantamount to surrendering the colonies to foreign conqueror.  A crucial part of maintaining personal liberty in Protestant colonial America was keeping Roman Catholics out of government.  But then came the Revolution.  The colonial citizenry fought for and won their independence from Great Britain.  They established a Constitution that amounted to…surrendering their country to a foreign conqueror.  Consider the legalities.  Before the Constitution was ratified, American Catholics had few civil rights; after ratification, they had them all.  Article VI, section3 provides that “no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the authority of the United States,” while the First Amendment denies Congress the power “to make any law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”  With Article IV Section 3 and the First Amendment, the Constitution welcomed agents of Pontifex Maximus, the world’s chief enemy of Protestantism, into the ranks of government.
    Of the 2,500,000 enumerated inhabitants in 1787 America, the Roman Catholic population consisted of no more than 16,000 in Maryland, 7,000 in Pennsylvania, 1,500 in New York, and 200 in Virginia. Once the Constitution was in place, a steady influx of European immigrants transformed Roman Catholicism from America’s smallest to largest religious denomination.  By 1850, the higher powers at Rome could view the United States as a viable tributary, if not another papal state.
    This awesome result did not just happen.  I submit that it was brilliantly designed and commanded by a man I am pleased to honor as the American republic’s least know founding father, Lorenzo Ricci (pronounced “Richey.”) Ricci was a Tuscan aristocrat by birth, a stoical philosopher by reputation, and a Jesuit father by profession.  He was Superior General of the Society of Jesus during the formative years of the American Revolution, from 1758 until 1775.  He also may be credited with having written the most celebrated treatise on war ever published, a work entitled The Thirteen Articles Concerning Military Art.

The below is out of the Book “Rulers of Evil”
by Tupper Sausy page 160&161
    In September 1769, Prince William appointed Meyer Amschel Rothschild of nearby Frankfurt to transact some of his financial affairs in the capacity of Crown Agent.  Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish Family, I looked them up in Encyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the title “Guardians of the Vatican Treasury.” The Vatican Treasury, of course, holds the imperial wealth of Rome.  Imperial wealth grows in proportion  to its victories in war-as the Jesuit empowerment Regimin militantis ecclesiae implies, the Church-at-war is more necessary than the Church-at-Peace.  According to H. Russell Robinson’s illustrated Armour of Imperial Rome, Caesarean soldiers protected themselves in battle with shields painted red.  Since the soldiery is the State’s most valuable resource (the Council of Trent admitted this in preferring the Jesuits to all other religious orders) it is easy to understand why the red shield was identified with the very life of the Church.  Hence, the appropriateness of the name Rothschild, German for “red shield.”
     The appointment of Rothschild gave the black papacy absolute financial privacy and secrecy. Who would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church? I believe this appointment explains why the House of Rothschild is famous for helping nations go to war. It is fascinating that, as Meyer Rothschild’s sons grew into the family business, the firm took on the title Meyer Amschel Rothschild und Sohne, which gives us the notariqon MARS. Isn’t Mars the Roman God of War, whose heavenly manifestation is “the red planet”? There is powerful cabalah here, and there’s hardly an acre of inhabitable earth that hasn’t been affected by it in some way.
     International finance and banking are NOT primarily ‘Jewish’. Many of the most powerful banking interests in the world are run by ‘Gentiles’. One of the most powerful forces in international banking is the Knights of Malta, a Roman Catholic military order controlled by the Jesuit Superior General. Sadly, even a certain segment of the ‘alternative media’ helps to propagate the LIE that ‘the Jews’ run international banking. Interestingly, one of the titles of the Rothschild banking dynasty is ‘Guardians of the Vatican Treasury’. ‘The Jews’, as a people, have been used for centuries as a ‘scapegoat’ by these international banksters and their secret societies, such as the Jesuit-controlled Knights of Malta. To label ‘the Jews’ as running banking, Hollywood, etc, is to throw out the proverbial ‘red herring’ designed to throw us off the scent of the                                        “real controllers.”

www.granddesignexposed.com

“No words could be so true as these.  Conspiracy theories only remain theories when there is no judge, no court, no legal representative, no assembly, with the valor to expose the evidence.  In every case where the evidence is put into practice, the theory becomes instantly recognizable as a case of criminal conspiracy.”

To print download the PDF on Rulers of Evil  Click here
It is printer friendly in a PDF format.  You can also save it to
your computer for future reference.